Documentation

UI Parity Validation Protocol

AITWIRE measures the engine layer: every probe goes through the AI engines' official, publicly available APIs. Consumer applications built on those engines may layer search, personalization, memory, and product behavior on top of the same model. This protocol measures how closely the engine-layer scores track what the consumer products actually say — so the fidelity tiers published on the methodology page are validated numbers, not assumptions.

Sampling

  • Quarterly, roughly 50 brand probes per cycle, drawn from the live probe pool and stratified across query intent the same way production polling is (branded, category, competitor, local, buyer-intent).
  • Every sampled probe runs on both arms in the same 48-hour window, so model drift between arms is bounded.
  • API arm — the standard production probe route: the engine's official API, run cold, model id recorded.
  • UI arm — the same question asked manually, by a human, in the engine's consumer product.

UI-arm session rules

The UI arm is manual human use only — no automation, no scripted browsers, no scraping — and must not violate any product's terms of service.

  • Fresh, logged-out sessions (clean browser profile, no cookies, no account) wherever the product allows anonymous use.
  • Where a product requires login: a fresh account created for validation, with memory, personalization, and chat-history training turned off wherever the product exposes those controls. The session mode used is recorded per engine.
  • No custom instructions, default model selection, one question per conversation — no follow-ups, since context accumulation is exactly the product-layer behavior being isolated.
  • Responses are captured verbatim before the next question is asked.

Scoring and metrics

Both arms are scored with the same six judge dimensions used in production — accuracy, citation, sentiment, quality, recommendation, and competitive position — by the same agreement-validated judge pipeline. Per engine and dimension we report percent agreement (share of probes where both arms receive the same verdict) and Cohen's κ (chance-corrected agreement), each with its sample size. Cells with n < 20 are reported as directional only.

Publication

The full table and raw transcripts are retained internally as an auditable evidence trail. A summary — per-engine agreement and κ, sample sizes, and the validation date — is published on the methodology page each cycle.

When parity drops

  1. Investigate a product-layer change first — consumer products ship retrieval, memory, and routing changes without notice; the affected probes are re-run to separate a one-off from a shift.
  2. If the shift is real, the engine's fidelity tier on the methodology page is annotated or moved in the same release as the published results — the inventory never claims a parity the latest validation contradicts.
  3. If reported statistics are affected, the change is recorded in the versioned methodology changelog and affected figures are restated.

Scope notes

  • Engines are validated against their own consumer product (e.g. the OpenAI API arm vs the ChatGPT app). Meta AI is a named proxy — AITWIRE probes Llama, the model Meta AI is built on — so its parity result measures that proxy distance itself and is expected to be the widest.
  • Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, and Apple Intelligence are not probed at the engine layer and are therefore not part of this validation.