AITWIRE Legal
The governed AI layer for law firms.
Harvey can change. CoCounsel can change. New tools arrive every quarter. Your firm's approved knowledge, policies, matter controls, test standards and evidence shouldn't change with them.
AITWIRE Legal connects, governs and tests the AI your firm uses — the public AI answering questions about the firm, the legal AI your lawyers work in, and the AI your clients meet — without asking the firm to standardize on any one of them.
AI Drift Monitor — Legal Practices
ChatGPT recommends firm for family law — practice wound down 2 years ago
Perplexity lists Michael Torres as Senior Partner — departed Q4 2024
AI Overview recommends firm to Alberta client — not licensed in Alberta
Quora thread cites $250/hr rate from 2021 — rate structure changed
Don’t standardize on one AI. Standardize the controls around all of them.
AITWIRE doesn’t replace the legal AI your lawyers choose — it is the vendor-neutral layer that connects them to what the firm has approved, holds them to the firm’s standard, and keeps the evidence.
Answers
live todayKnow what AI says about your firm — and your clients. Practice areas, lawyers, jurisdictions, fees and positions, graded against the record the firm approves, with drift alerts and verified change.
Connect
live todayWork securely across your AI and knowledge systems — the firm's approved knowledge and capabilities connected over the open MCP standard, and work moved between AI applications over the open AHP standard.
Private AI
with AITWIRE AITest the AI your firm runs or buys — Harvey, CoCounsel, internal copilots, client-facing bots — against the information you approve and the claims you prohibit, before deployment and continuously after.
Assurance
in developmentEvidence that systems and workflows meet the firm's requirements — including the handoffs between AI applications, not just the applications themselves.
Retainer
in developmentGive clients a governed AI front door to the firm — intake and triage in the firm's own channel, with escalation and a clean handoff to the right lawyer when it becomes legal work.
Lab
in developmentEvaluate what to deploy next — new AI products, models and workflows compared against the firm's own questions and standards, before and during adoption.
Governed by AITWIRE
Approved information · Matter boundaries · Permissions · Policies · Human approvals · Evidence
One control layer under every capability: AITWIRE governs what moves between the AI applications your firm uses — which system may receive what, for which matter, with an approval and a record.
Built on open standards — MCP for governed access, AHP for moving work between AI applications — so the firm’s controls outlive any one vendor. AITWIRE tests the handoffs, not just the systems.
It starts with Answers — live today
What is AI telling prospective clients about your firm?
And a service line for your clients: what are AI systems telling their customers, investors and counterparties — and is any of it legally problematic? Advice your firm can deliver, measured on AITWIRE.
AI recommends your firm for practice areas you no longer handle
Your firm wound down its family law practice two years ago. ChatGPT still recommends you for family law in your city — and you receive inquiries from prospective clients you can't help. Incorrect AI answers about your practice areas waste everyone's time and create professional risk.
Departed attorneys appear in AI descriptions of your team
A senior partner left to start their own firm. Their name still appears in AI answers about your firm's team, their profile still ranks on your old website, and LinkedIn keeps them associated with your practice.
AI ignores your jurisdiction limitations
Your firm is licensed in Ontario and Quebec. AI systems recommend you to prospective clients in Alberta and British Columbia — where you have no licence to practise. Jurisdictional accuracy in AI answers is a professional conduct issue.
AI quotes outdated fee structures and retainer policies
A Quora thread from 2022 where a former client described your fees has become an AI training signal. Current prospective clients are being told incorrect information about your billing model before they even make contact.
What AITWIRE does about it
Practice area and LegalService schema
Publish LegalService JSON-LD for each practice area with accurate scope, jurisdiction, and attorney assignments. When AI answers 'what does [firm] specialise in,' it gets today's practice profile — not the old website copy.
Attorney bio schema with current credentials
Publish Person/Attorney JSON-LD for each current attorney with their bar membership, jurisdictions, specialisations, and years of call. AITWIRE monitors when AI systems cite outdated or departed attorney information.
Jurisdictional restriction governance
Assert canonical facts about your firm's geographic and jurisdictional scope. AITWIRE detects when AI systems recommend your firm to prospective clients in jurisdictions you cannot serve — a potential professional conduct concern.
Fee and engagement model accuracy
Assert canonical facts about your billing model, consultation fees, and retainer policies. Fact Governance flags when AI systems describe your fees inaccurately — based on outdated reviews or forum posts.
Legal category query monitoring
AITWIRE probes the queries prospective clients use — 'best employment lawyer in [city],' 'corporate solicitor for [type of transaction]' — and tracks whether your firm appears accurately and where competitors are displacing you.
Social profile and directory consistency
AI systems cross-reference multiple sources about a law firm — website, LinkedIn, bar association directories, legal directories. AITWIRE audits consistency across these surfaces and verifies your sameAs links anchor the canonical firm entity.
One control layer across your firm’s AI.
Start by checking whether your site is ready for AI retrieval — free, no account, under a minute — or talk to us about the firm-wide layer.